Pastis wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:17 amKitch wrote: Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:03 am Well, 1986cc is a 2.0 engine, so you were correct there!
Around town there's not much problem, but then a 2CV is probably quick enough around town. My BX 16 auto (early mk1) struggled once you got out of town. There was a million rpm drop between each gear shift, and it was always inbetween them, especially on the motorway. Can't remember if it was smooth or not (I think it was) but IMO the 1.6 engine just isn't flexible enough. I had to cain it to overtake anybody on the motorway, or make progress up hills, and that just ruined the economy. I expect a 1.9 would be much, much better, and a TD would probably be an ideal combo. Just a shame they never made them.
Around town there's not much problem Isn't that anywhere in the UK nowadays?! It's not until you go somewhere like France that you realise just how bad our roads are nowadays.
a 2CV is probably quick enough around town Easier to park and, in London, you can get places you can't squeeze through in anything wider. And, to illustrate a point re. 'slow' cars: From home to the centre of Bristol is exactly 60 miles. The quickest I've ever done it is in - a 2CV! I've tried to beat my time several times, caning it down the M4, never managed it......
Agreed when I had my Dyane in the late 80s and early 90s journeys didn't seem any longer, but then it could easily cruise at 70-75. Perhaps there were fewer cars or better lane discipline.
My GTi auto is a real point and shoot car, so easy to drive around town but plenty fast enough when it needs to be. For the most part gear changes seemed right to me and this was for one who hated automatics up to this point. That said after the kick down cable was repaired it just hangs on to gears for way, way too long now and is a bit of a pain at times. Not many GTi autos around though...